Neurobiology of Food Addiction

By Emily | Published on  

Barbara’s Story: An Introduction to Addiction

Addiction is a complex and often misunderstood topic, but Barbara’s story provides a relatable and eye-opening introduction to the subject. Unfortunately, unhealthy habits were modeled at home during Barbara’s upbringing, and she had close relatives who struggled with addiction. As she got older, she found that a certain substance was highly rewarding for her, and she began actively seeking it out and consuming it without experiencing negative consequences.

Over time, however, Barbara began to experience the negative health effects associated with long-term substance use. She had intense cravings, struggled with depression, and despite her efforts to reduce her intake, was unable to quit. Barbara’s story is not unique; in fact, one in five Canadians will meet the criteria for substance use disorder at some point in their lifetime.

The statistics are staggering: four in ten Canadians will meet the criteria for addiction to tobacco products, two in ten will meet the criteria for addiction to alcohol, and six in 100 (or about 6% of the population) will meet the criteria for addiction to cannabis and other illicit substances. The social cost of addiction, according to a 2006 study, was approximately $39.8 billion each year, which amounts to just over $1,200 per person in Canada. These costs include both direct costs like healthcare and law enforcement, as well as indirect costs like lost productivity at work.

Barbara’s specific addiction to food will cost Canadians approximately $4.5 billion each year. The controversy surrounding food addiction has been ongoing for the past decade, with social media and scientific spheres weighing in on the debate. Addiction is a highly adaptive process, evolved to seek out rewarding substances and behaviors as a means of survival. However, in our modern environment, where unnaturally reinforcing substances are plentifully available, this adaptive process becomes maladaptive.

As a society, we need to broaden our understanding of addiction beyond drugs and start thinking of addiction as a very old brain’s way of trying to deal with a very new problem. By becoming aware and informed about addiction, we can start to shift the conversation towards finding effective solutions and supporting those who struggle with addiction. Barbara’s story may be just the beginning, but it is a powerful reminder of the impact of addiction on individuals and society as a whole.

When we think of addiction, substances like drugs, alcohol, and tobacco often come to mind. However, as Barbara’s story illustrates, addiction can also manifest in unexpected ways. In her case, Barbara’s addiction was to food. While some may dispute the idea of food addiction, the controversy surrounding the topic has been ongoing for the past decade.

On one side of the debate are individuals who claim to suffer from food addiction and provide anecdotal evidence of their experiences and those of people they know. They argue that certain foods can trigger compulsive and uncontrollable behavior, just like addictive substances. On the other side are those who argue that the concept of food addiction is simply an excuse for overeating or a lack of self-control. They contend that food does not have the same addictive properties as drugs and that the term “food addiction” is misleading and unsupported by scientific evidence.

The controversy over food addiction is also present in the scientific community. While health scientists have started recognizing the hallmark features of addiction in people who struggle with food, some researchers argue that food cannot be classified in the same way as drugs. They contend that the neurobiological changes that happen when someone becomes addicted to drugs are not present in individuals who claim to suffer from food addiction.

However, recent research by Dr. Jordan B. Peterson, a psychologist at the University of Toronto, has shed new light on the subject. Dr. Peterson’s study exposed rats to refined white sugar, a substance commonly found in food and highly rewarding, and found that the rats began to binge on the sugar and heavily escalated their intake over time. When placed in a situation that pitted their instinctual mechanism for avoiding danger against their learned behavior to seek out and consume sugar, the rats completely overrode their instinctual mechanism in favor of seeking out sugar.

Dr. Peterson also found that the specific brain area implicated in survival-based motivated behaviors responded very differently to dopamine, the brain’s primary rewarding neurotransmitter, than the neurons did in animals that had either had no exposure to cocaine or had been exposed to cocaine but weren’t self-administering it for a long period of time. This is a unique change that happens to the neurons in the brain area that is implicated in the development of addiction, and it is similar to what happens in the brains of animals that self-administer cocaine.

In conclusion, while there is still much to learn about food addiction, the evidence suggests that it is a real and serious problem. We need to broaden our understanding of addiction beyond drugs and start thinking of addiction as a very old brain’s way of trying to deal with a very new problem. By doing so, we can begin to find effective solutions and provide support for those who struggle with food addiction.

While the debate over food addiction continues, one crucial question remains: can the rewarding properties of food produce addiction? This question is particularly important given the prevalence of obesity and eating disorders in our society. Dr. Jordan B. Peterson, a psychologist at the University of Toronto, sought to answer this question through a series of experiments with rats and refined sugar.

Dr. Peterson exposed rats to refined white sugar, a substance commonly found in food and highly rewarding, for 12 hours a day, every day for about a month. He used a concentration of sugar that is commonly found in sweetened beverages, which is about 10%. Dr. Peterson found that the rats began to binge on the sugar and heavily escalated their intake over time. By the end of the experiment, the rats were consuming roughly one-fifth of their body weight in sugar, which is a staggering amount.

To determine whether exposure to this amount of sugar could produce compulsion, Dr. Peterson put the rats in an evolutionarily relevant situation. He pitted their instinctual mechanism for avoiding danger against their learned behavior to seek out and consume sugar. Dr. Peterson found that the rats completely ignored their instinctual mechanism and chose to seek out sugar instead, demonstrating a compulsive behavior.

Compulsion is one of the hallmark features of addiction. It is defined as an irresistible urge to behave in a way that runs contrary to your express conscious wishes. In addiction, individuals are unable to stop themselves from consuming a substance, even if they no longer wish to or derive any enjoyment from doing so.

Dr. Peterson’s experiments with rats and refined sugar demonstrate that food can indeed produce compulsive behavior. The rats in his experiment chose to seek out and consume sugar even when it put them in danger. This behavior is similar to what we see in humans who struggle with addiction to drugs or alcohol.

In conclusion, while there is still controversy surrounding food addiction, the evidence suggests that the rewarding properties of food can indeed produce addiction. By understanding the neurological changes that happen in the brain when someone becomes addicted, we can begin to find effective solutions and provide support for those who struggle with addiction to food. It is time to broaden our understanding of addiction beyond drugs and start thinking about it as a very old brain’s way of trying to deal with a very new problem.

Addiction is a complex condition that can be characterized by a range of behaviors and symptoms. While there is still much to learn about addiction, one thing is clear: addiction causes neurobiological changes in the brain that affect behavior and thought patterns. In this post, we’ll explore the neurobiological changes that occur in the brain during addiction and how this new understanding can broaden our understanding of addiction beyond drugs.

Traditionally, addiction has been associated with drugs like cocaine and heroin. However, as Dr. Jordan B. Peterson explains in his TEDx talk, addiction can be caused by any highly rewarding substance or behavior. This includes things like gambling, video games, and food. In fact, Dr. Peterson’s experiments with rats and refined sugar demonstrate that food can indeed produce compulsive behavior, similar to what we see in humans who struggle with addiction to drugs or alcohol.

This new understanding of addiction beyond drugs is crucial. By broadening our understanding of addiction, we can begin to provide better support and treatment for those who struggle with addiction. It also highlights the need for further research and exploration into the underlying mechanisms of addiction.

So why do neurobiological changes occur in the brain during addiction? The answer lies in our evolutionary history. Our brains have evolved to seek out rewarding substances and behaviors because, in our evolutionary past, these behaviors meant survival. However, in our modern society, unnaturally reinforcing substances and behaviors are widely available, leading to addiction.

Addiction can be thought of as an old brain’s response to a new problem. Our evolved biology pushes us to consume rewarding substances and perform rewarding behaviors, but our modern environment is full of these substances and behaviors. This creates a war between our evolved biology and our modern environment, leading to addiction.

In conclusion, addiction causes neurobiological changes in the brain that affect behavior and thought patterns. While addiction has traditionally been associated with drugs, our understanding of addiction has broadened to include any highly rewarding substance or behavior. By understanding addiction as an old brain’s response to a new problem, we can begin to find effective solutions and provide support for those who struggle with addiction. It is time to think beyond drugs and start thinking about addiction as a complex condition that affects many aspects of our lives.

Addiction is a complex condition that can have serious consequences for individuals and society as a whole. It can be caused by a range of substances and behaviors, including drugs, gambling, video games, and even food. Despite the controversy surrounding the idea of food addiction, research has shown that the rewarding properties of food can produce addiction-like behaviors in animals.

The neurobiological changes that occur in the brain during addiction are complex and can affect behavior and thought patterns. These changes are a response to the unnatural availability of highly rewarding substances and behaviors in our modern society. Addiction can be thought of as an old brain’s response to a new problem.

Our understanding of addiction is continually evolving, and it is important to broaden our understanding beyond drugs. By doing so, we can provide better support and treatment for those who struggle with addiction. It is crucial that we continue to question and investigate the mechanisms of addiction to find effective solutions for this complex condition.

In conclusion, addiction is a complex and multifaceted condition that affects individuals and society as a whole. By understanding the neurobiological changes that occur in the brain during addiction and broadening our understanding of addiction beyond drugs, we can begin to find effective solutions and support those who struggle with addiction.